ArticleJAMA network open2025
Fertility of Adults Born Very Preterm or With Very Low Birth Weight.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bronchopulmonary dysplasia and extremely preterm birth: time for a broader perspective on long-term outcomes.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Reproductive Outcomes in Women Born With Low Birth Weight, Preterm or Small for Gestational Age: A Population-Based Register Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- Consanguineous marriages and low birth weight mediating role of antenatal care visits.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Are the Previously Reported Risk Factors for Endometriosis Actually Associated With Pain and Infertility Rather Than Endometriosis Itself?Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Contradictory differences regarding fertility among adults born very preterm (VP; <32 weeks' gestation) or with very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g) have been reported at different ages. Longitudinal investigations of fertility beyond ages 20 to 29 years are lacking. Objective: To assess whether VP and VLBW are associated with lower fertility up to age 35 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective population-based cohort study was conducted in Bavaria, Germany, with participants born between January 1985 and March 1986 who required admission to a children's hospital within the first 10 days after birth. Healthy infants born at term (ie, at least 37 weeks' gestation) in the same hospital and children alive at 6 years were selected as controls. Follow-up occurred repeatedly up to 34 to 35 years. Data were analyzed from July to December 2024. Exposures: Gestational age and birth weight. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cumulative incidence of having the first alive child (ie, fertility) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimation and the difference between participants born VP or with VLBW and term-born participants was compared with log-rank tests. Univariable and hierarchical multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for fertility associated with VP and VLBW adjusting for individual factors. Estimations were compared between early (<30 years) and late (≥30 years) reproductive windows. Results: A total of 414 participants (212 born VP or with VLBW and 202 term-born) were included (mean [SD] age, 34.67 [0.53] years; 216 [52.2%] female). Cumulative incidence of having the first alive child was lower in participants born VP or with VLBW throughout the follow-up. The association of VP and VLBW with lower fertility was significant during the late (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31-0.68) but not early (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.47-1.14) reproductive window; this association attenuated after adjusting for neonatal factors (sex and family socioeconomic status) and childhood neurosensory impairment at step 2 (HR, 0.59; 95% CI 0.40-0.88), childhood family factors (eg, parenting) at step 3 (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.92), and there was no longer an association after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (eg, partnering) at step 4 (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.50-1.20). Partnering (ie, being married or cohabitating with a partner) had the largest magnitude association with fertility across both the early (HR, 7.87; 95% CI, 3.44-18.00) and late (HR, 3.95; 95% CI, 2.47-6.31) reproductive windows. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of participants born VP or with VLBW and term-born adults, VP and VLBW were associated with overall lower fertility. A major reason was an association of less partnering with lower fertility, suggesting that partnering is key to reproductive success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.