ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
Enhancing Robotic Surgery Training and Reducing Remote Complications with Telesurgery Technology.
Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reframing Anesthetic Principles: Telesurgery as the Natural Evolution of Robotic Surgery.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
- Redefining Surgical Collaboration: The First Structured Transcontinental Robotic Tele-mentoring Experience Between Africa and South America.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe 2001 Lindbergh operation provided evidence for the feasibility of transatlantic telesurgery.(1-3) However, technological and economic challenges have limited the implementation of this technique.(4-6) This video illustrates details of a telesurgery connection over a 13,000 km distance between Orlando (USA) and Shanghai (China). Surgeons at both locations operated simultaneously on the same animals using telesurgery consoles (MicroPort® MedBot™) for teleproctoring, allowing for a robust evaluation of connectivity and robotic system performance across vast distances.
methodsOn July 23rd and 24th, 2024, we conducted a prospective telesurgery study using live animal models (porcine) connecting Orlando to Shanghai. We reproduced a real-life telesurgery scenario where both ends of the connection had control over the robot. Four surgeons were in Orlando and one in Shanghai. We illustrated the communication between surgeons and highlighted the potential of telesurgery to improve outcomes and teaching robotic surgery.
resultsConnectivity and robotic technology performed optimally for several hours without troubleshooting or malfunctions. Median delay was 139 milliseconds (137-216) on the first day and 139 milliseconds (137-185) on the second day. The surgeons were able to switch the console control multiple times during the procedures. They could communicate, discuss cases in real-time, and seamlessly transfer control in critical steps of the surgery.
conclusionsThis video underscores the practical potential of Telesurgery use in teleproctoring, particularly when an experienced remote surgeon steps in to assist another surgeon during complex or challenging procedures. It highlights Telesurgery's potential for training and improving outcomes in robotic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.