ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2025
Public social protection policies for people affected by tuberculosis: a documentary analysis.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in people living with HIV: Clinical issues, therapeutic challenges and perspectives in sub-Saharan Africa. A narrative review.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026Review
- Article
- Evaluation of social protection for people affected by tuberculosis: development of an indicator matrix for Brazil.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background(1) The right to health care includes public policies in the scope of SUS to address TB. (2) The right to social care emphasized access to services, programs, and benefits. (3) The right to social security covered retirements and benefits for people with TB. (4) Interministerial responsibility, intersectoral responsibility, and responsibility shared between SUS and SUAS. (5) Challenges in accessing rights to social care and health care persist for people with TB. to analyze the normative documents that seek to guarantee the right to social protection for people affected by tuberculosis in force in Brazil in 2023. qualitative documentary research carried out in September 2023, based on the survey of documents at the national, state and municipal levels, from government agencies and social control bodies after the promulgation of the Federal Constitution, on four electronic platforms, exported and organized in the Atlas.ti software, and interpreted based on content analysis, thematic mode. the analytical corpus consisted of 30 normative documents - nine laws, seven technical-institutional materials, five ordinances, four resolutions, two decrees, a technical cooperation agreement, a normative instruction, and an operational instruction - from which four thematic categories emerged: the right to health care, the right to social care, the right to social security, and the sharing of responsibilities. policies to protect people with tuberculosis in Brazil are recent and there is still much room for improvement toward a comprehensive approach through intersectoral and interministerial coordination, aiming to address social vulnerability and reaffirming the State's duty to guarantee social protection by means of public policies that promote life, citizenship, human rights, and social justice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.