Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40105595›Full record

ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2025

Nausea and vomiting in an evolving anticancer treatment landscape: long-delayed and emetogenic antibody-drug conjugates.

Yeon Hee Park, Giampaolo Bianchini, Javier Cortés, Luca Licata, María Vidal, Hirotoshi Iihara, Eric J Roeland, Karin Jordan, Florian Scotté, Lee Schwartzberg and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A phase 2 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dose-finding study of oral NEPA for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Netupitant versus aprepitant: model-predicted neurokinin-1 receptor occupancy and implications for long-delayed nausea and vomiting prevention.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yeon Hee ParkDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Giampaolo BianchiniDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Javier CortésInternational Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Luca LicataDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
María VidalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Hirotoshi IiharaDepartment of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
Eric J RoelandKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Karin JordanDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital, Potsdam, Germany.
Florian ScottéInterdisciplinary Cancer Course Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France.
Lee SchwartzbergRenown Health-Pennington Cancer Institute, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.
Rudolph M NavariWorld Health Organization, Mount Olive, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-896X
Matti AaproGenolier Cancer Centre, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland.
Hope S RugoUniversity of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nausea and vomiting are common, distressing side effects associated with chemotherapeutic regimens, resulting in reduced quality of life and treatment adherence. Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis strategies may reduce/prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Historically, investigators assessed antiemetics up to 120 hours after chemotherapy. However, CINV can extend beyond this time. Thus, the effect of antiemetics during the long-delayed period (>120 hours) requires investigation. Emerging treatment options, including certain antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), are associated with high rates of acute and late-onset nausea and vomiting that can last for extended duration. With the increasing number of ADCs approved and in development, there is urgency to control nausea and vomiting in patients receiving these new therapies. In this narrative review, we present the emetogenic potential of ADCs and CINV in the long-delayed period along with antiemetic prophylaxis strategies used to date. We also discuss the promising role of the fixed-combination antiemetic NEPA ([fos]netupitant plus palonosetron) in controlling long-delayed nausea and vomiting, addressing characteristics that may contribute to its longer efficacy duration compared to other antiemetics. Finally, we highlight encouraging results with NEPA in patients receiving the ADCs trastuzumab deruxtecan or sacituzumab govitecan, which suggest NEPA may be an effective antiemetic prophylaxis in these settings.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesNauseaNeoplasmsVomitingAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansQuality of LifeAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesantibody-drug conjugatesantiemeticslong-delayed CINVNausea and vomitingNEPAnetupitant and palonosetron

Identifiers

PMID40105595
PMCPMC11988240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.