Trial reportRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2025
Comparative study of long-term efficacy of spinal fusion surgery and non-surgical treatment for chronic radicular lumbar disease.
Trial report in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the long-term efficacy of spinal fusion surgery versus non-surgical treatment for chronic radicular lumbar spondylopathy.
methodsA total of 93 patients with chronic radicular lumbar spondylopathy admitted to our hospital from February 2020 to February 2021 were randomly divided into a non-surgical group (n=46, conservative treatment) and a surgical group (n=47, spinal fusion surgery). Efficacy, recurrence rate, pain index, lumbar function recovery, and quality of life were evaluated and compared between the groups.
resultsThe surgical group had a higher total effective rate (97.87 vs. 86.96%, p<0.05) and a lower recurrence rate after 1 year (4.26 vs. 21.74%, p<0.05) compared to the non-surgical group. There was no significant difference in visual analog scale scores for lower back pain and lower limb pain between the groups before treatment and for the first 3 days (p>0.05). However, at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after treatment, the visual analog scale scores were significantly lower in the surgical group (p<0.05). The Japanese Orthopedic Association score showed no significant difference before treatment (p>0.05) but increased significantly in the surgical group after 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year (p<0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey score before treatment (p>0.05), but the surgical group had significantly higher scores after 1 year (p<0.05).
conclusionSpinal fusion surgery offers better long-term efficacy than non-surgical treatment for chronic radicular lumbar spondylopathy. It effectively alleviates lower back and limb pain, promotes lumbar function recovery, and improves quality of life, making it a recommended treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.