ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2025
Cross-sectional entomological monitoring combined with professional qualifications in transition areas for yellow fever and autochthonous malaria in the Atlantic Forest in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Yellow fever's distressing return: a wake-up call for public health in the Americas.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Atlantic Forest harbours a rich mosquito assemblage, including vectors for diverse arbovirus. Mosquito species adapt to urban-forest landscape changes, acting as bridge vectors for pathogens.
objectivesThis study evaluated different collection methods for immature and adult mosquitoes combined with improving field personnel qualifications in a transition area between urbanised and sylvatic environments.
methodsImmature and adult mosquitoes were collected from 33 collection points established in urban and peri-urban, sylvatic and transitional areas using different capture methods. During the course, 107 professionals were qualified.
findingsVectors (Anophelinae and Culicinae) were dominant in the urban/peri-urban environment (51.49%), followed by the transitional (26.69%) and sylvatic (21.82%) environments. Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse), Ae. (Ochlerotatus) scapularis (Rondani), Ae. (Stg.) aegypti (Linnaeus), Haemagogus (Conopostegus) leucocelaenus (Dyar & Shannon), undetermined Culex, Cx. (Melanoconion) pilosus (Dyar and Knab), Cx. (Carrollia) urichii (Coquillett), and Sabethes (Sabethes) albiprivus Theobald were most abundant, with Ae. albopictus collected from all ecotopes. Ovitrap provided a robust sample of the immature stages (92.8%), whereas other methods contributed 3.59% of total immatures, but greatest species richness (14 species). For adult mosquitoes, Shannon light trap resulted in greatest abundance (86.16%). MAIN
conclusionsThe use of varied sampling techniques led to collection of a high mosquito species richness, which, combined with programs for training local professionals, should be an integral part of health surveillance for monitoring the risk of vector-borne diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.