The quandary of anticoagulation for sepsis patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Outcomes of anticoagulation initiation in critically ill patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026
   Article
2. What If We Let It Fibrillate? New Perspective on Atrial Fibrillation in Sepsis.Current medical science · 2026
   Review
3. Aspirin is associated with improved outcomes in sepsis patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
   Article
4. Treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias in critical care patients with sepsis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.