ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2025
Improved Pharyngeal Contraction and Oral Intake Status After Modified Central-Part Laryngectomy for Late-Stage ALS.
Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilevel surgical management for severe dysphagia due to lower cranial nerve palsy with multimodal functional assessment: a case report.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Psychosocial Barriers and Social Perceptions in Oncology Patients with Tracheostomy: Case-Control Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of modified central-part laryngectomy with pharyngeal space reduction (CPL-PR) on patients with weak deglutitive pharyngeal contraction, as seen in late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). STUDY
designRetrospective case series.
settingSingle-institution academic center.
methodsPatients with late-stage ALS confined at The University of Tokyo Hospital between 2019 and March 2024 in whom CPL-PR had been performed were identified. Patients who had undergone simultaneous pharyngeal flap surgery or had no preoperative high-resolution manofluorography done were excluded. Preoperatively, penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) scores were determined via videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Functional oral intake scale (FOIS) scores and high-resolution manometric parameters were measured and compared preoperatively and postoperatively.
resultsEighteen patients were identified with a median age of 66.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 58.0-74.8). The median preoperative PAS score was 7.5 (IQR: 5.5-8.0), indicating severe dysphagia. There was significant improvement in oral intake status with FOIS scores increasing from 1 (IQR: 1-1) to 3 (IQR: 2-3) at 3 months postoperatively (P = .0002). Significant increases in velopharyngeal closure integral (P = .024) and mesohypopharyngeal contractile integral (P = .0001) were observed. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressure was reduced (P = .0002), and UES relaxation time was prolonged during swallowing (P < .0001).
conclusionThere were tangible improvements in pharyngeal contraction, UES bolus passage, and oral intake status following CPL-PR, which contribute to regaining oral intake in late-stage ALS. CPL-PR is an option for patients requiring tracheostomy who wish to prevent aspiration and regain their ability to take food orally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.