Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40105375›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025

Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates: a diagnostic test accuracy review.

Thomas H Dierikx, Douwe H Visser, Tim de Meij, James Versalovic, Mariska Mg Leeflang, Chris Cooper, Mohan Pammi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Longitudinal biomarker trajectories and their prognostic utility for 21-day mortality in burn patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas H DierikxDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases & Infection Prevention, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Douwe H VisserDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tim de MeijDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
James VersalovicDepartment of Pathology, Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mariska Mg LeeflangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Chris CooperCochrane Neonatal, Vermont Oxford Network, Vermont, USA.
Mohan PammiDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobial cultures for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis have low sensitivity and reporting delay. Advances in molecular microbiology have fostered new molecular assays that are rapid and may improve neonatal outcomes.

objectivesTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of various molecular methods for the diagnosis of culture-positive bacterial and fungal sepsis in neonates and to explore heterogeneity among studies by analyzing subgroups classified by gestational age and type of sepsis onset and compare molecular tests with one another. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries in August 2023. We checked reference lists of included studies and systematic reviews where subject matter related to the intervention or population examined in this review. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that were prospective or retrospective, cohort or cross-sectional design, which evaluated molecular assays (index test) in neonates with suspected sepsis in comparison with microbial cultures (reference standard). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the studies. We performed meta-analyses using the bivariate model and entered data into Review Manager. MAIN

resultsSeventy-four studies were eligible for inclusion, of which 68 studies provided data for meta-analysis. The total number of participants was 14,309 (1328 infants who were culture-positive and 12,981 infants who were culture-negative) from 68 studies that were included in the meta-analysis. The summary estimate of sensitivity was 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 0.95) and of specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.92) (low-certainty evidence). We explored heterogeneity by subgroup analyses of type of test, gestational age, type of sepsis onset and prevalence of sepsis. We found insufficient explanations for the heterogeneity (low- to very low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analyses including studies that analyzed blood samples, using good methodology and those that did not use multiple samples from the same participant revealed similar results (low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS'

conclusionsMolecular assays have the advantage of producing rapid results and have moderate diagnostic accuracy. Molecular assays may prevent overuse of antibiotics in neonates with suspected sepsis. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these molecular assays should be evaluated using randomized trials comparing molecular assays as an add-on test versus conventional methods without the add-on test in neonates with suspected sepsis.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesNeonatal SepsisSepsisBiasHumansInfant, NewbornSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID40105375
PMCPMC11921763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.