ArticleBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2025
Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Cross-Clamping Times in Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery by Ministernotomy with Sutureless Prosthesis Implantation Compared to Conventional Prosthesis: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective cohort study: association of Monocyte/HDL cholesterol ratio with early mortality in patients undergoing sutureless aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Right anterior mini-thoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement: An international and multicenter study.JTCVS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionValve replacement is one of the effective treatments for aortic valve disease. This study aims to compare cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemia times in aortic valve replacement surgeries using stented biological and sutureless prostheses (PERCEVAL®) through a minimally invasive ministernotomy approach. Methods: This single-center cross-sectional study, conducted from February 2015 to February 2021, assessed clinical and epidemiological characteristics in aortic valve replacement patients. It analyzed factors including hospital stay, early outcomes, valve etiology, intraoperative diagnosis, systolic gradients, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular mass. Two groups were studied: 12 patients with PERCEVAL® prostheses and 81 with conventional bioprostheses.
resultsThis study included 93 patients (age: 59 ± 16 years), 61.3% were male, and 80.2% had hypertension; dyslipidemias were present in 34.1% and 25.3% were diabetic. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times were 61 minutes and 41 minutes in the conventional bioprostheses group and 59.5 minutes and 39.5 minutes in the PERCEVAL® group (P=0.143 and P=0.058, respectively). Intensive care unit and overall hospital stays were statistically comparable between both groups (P=0.662 and P=0.599, respectively). All participants survived the 30-day postoperative period, with minimal complications, no significant differences in echocardiographic parameters were observed, yet higher values for certain cardiac function indicators were noted in the conventional bioprostheses group.
conclusionThe groups with conventional bioprostheses and sutureless prostheses (PERCEVAL®) didn't display significant differences in the analyzed variables for ministernotomy aortic valve replacement surgery. They exhibited similar results in terms of hospital stay duration, 30-day outcomes, and cardiac function values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.