ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
The Sheep Head Versus the Pig Head as a Training Model for Sialendoscopy.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge acquisition and retention following small-group case-based learning combined with sheep head animal model training in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a single-arm quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The Sheep Head Versus the Pig Head as a Training Model for Sialendoscopy.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSialendoscopy is a minimally invasive technique for treating inflammatory salivary gland diseases, requiring hands-on training due to its steep learning curve. While pig heads have been the standard training model for over two decades, sheep heads have recently emerged as an alternative. This study evaluates the efficiency of sheep heads for sialendoscopy training in newcomers.
methodsParticipants of the 32nd International Sialendoscopy Hands-on Course (Geneva, 2023) performed sialendoscopies on fresh pig and sheep heads. Self-assessment questionnaires were completed pre- and post-training, with procedures rated on a Likert scale. Tutors evaluated participants using standardized assessments and recorded procedural times.
resultsAmong 52 participants from 27 countries, significant improvement in diagnostic sialendoscopy comfort was reported for both models post-training. Female participants demonstrated higher success rates than male participants in diagnostic (2.8 vs. 2.5, p = 0.03) and therapeutic (2.9 vs. 2.4, p = 0.03) procedures. More participants successfully cannulated the parotid duct on sheep heads, while submandibular gland performance was comparable across models. Self-assessments favored sheep for parotid (63%) and pigs for submandibular (79%). Overall, 53% preferred the pig model, while 47% preferred the sheep.
conclusionBoth models are effective for training, with sheep heads offering advantages for parotid duct procedures. Despite the pig model's broader applications, logistical, cultural, and ethical constraints make sheep heads a viable alternative for sialendoscopy training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.