ArticleeLife2025
Rediscovering the
Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supporting-like cells constitute an alternative steroidogenic lineage conserved in amniotes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The gene regulatory landscape driving mouse gonadal supporting cell differentiation.Science advances · 2025Article
- Revisiting the rete ovarii.eLife · 2025Article
- Gene therapy with feline anti-Müllerian hormone analogs disrupts folliculogenesis and induces pregnancy loss in female domestic cats.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Bulk and single-cell transcriptome datasets of the mouse fetal and adult rete ovarii and surrounding tissues.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.