ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2025
Advancement of post-market surveillance of medical devices leveraging artificial intelligence: Patient monitors case study.
Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundHealthcare institutions throughout the world rely on medical devices to provide their services reliably and effectively. However, medical devices can, and do sometimes fail. These failures pose significant risk to patients.ObjectiveOne way to address these issues is through the use of artificial intelligence for the detection of medical device failure. This goal of this study was to develop automated systems utilising machine learning algorithms to predict patient monitor performance and potential failures based on data collected during regular safety and performance inspections.MethodsThe system developed in this study utilised machine learning techniques as its core. Throughout the study four algorithms were utilised. These algorithms include Decision Tree, Random Forest, Linear Regression and Support Vector Machines.ResultsFinal results showed that Random Forest algorithms had the best performance on various metrics among the four developed models. It achieved accuracy of 94% and precision and recall of 70% and 93% respectively.ConclusionThis study shows that use of systems like the one developed in this study have the potential to improve management and maintenance of medical devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40105179What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.