ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2025
Optimizing adherence to medication to improve outcomes in asthma.
Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record Data to Improve Asthma Management.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Disparities in asthma control and treatment: A spotlight on Mexican American children.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Article
- Asthma Awareness Questionnaire: Development, Psychometric Validation, and Extent.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Article
- Identification and longitudinal evaluation of inhaled medication adherence barriers using clinical natural language processing in asthma: a real-world cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advancements in diagnosis, preventive care, and future directions in the holistic management of pediatric asthma.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Analysis of key obstacles affecting long-term inhalation therapy compliance in children with bronchial asthma at primary hospitals.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- A guide for a patient-centric approach to asthma management: results of a European Delphi consensus programme.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAdherence to medication is essential for asthma control and reducing the risk of exacerbations. Research has accumulated in recent years on causes and consequences of adherence and effective interventions. This review highlights current advances in adherence research and their potential for clinical practice.
findingsOptimizing adherence to medication can be achieved through interventions that identify individual barriers and train the care team in offering tailored support. Digital technologies that facilitate remote monitoring, patient-provider communication and care coordination are increasingly being integrated into asthma care. SUMMARY: Adherence determinants reported cover individual, social and health service-related factors. Age and attitudes toward adherence are crucial determinants. Patients' and caregivers' mental health is relevant for adherence and clinical outcomes, highlighting the importance of integrating this aspect into holistic asthma management. Single-site care arrangements are beneficial for adherence. Tailoring adherence interventions to individual needs, using brief questionnaires to assess barriers and recommending evidence-based strategies to address them, have been found useful and feasible across care settings. Digital technologies such as smart inhaler systems and telemedicine-enhanced care have been shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials, yet implementation research highlights challenges to sustaining support on the long-term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.