ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Meningococcal vaccination disparities in the United States (2010-2021): Findings from the National Immunization Survey-Teen and a commercial insurance database.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the United States, while meningococcal vaccines are available and recommended for adolescents and young adults, coverage remains low and disparities persist. We evaluated meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, Y (MenACWY) and B (MenB) vaccine uptake, completion, and compliance using a cross-sectional analysis of National Immunization Survey-Teen (NIS-Teen) data (2015-2021) and a cohort analysis of commercial claims data (2010-2021). Regression models were used to identify factors associated with vaccine uptake. Included in the NIS-Teen MenACWY and MenB analyses were 138,952 and 177,077 patients, respectively. Included in the claims MenACWY and MenB analyses were 953,905 and 818,424 patients, respectively. In 2021, MenACWY uptake was 86.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.6-88.8%) among ≤13-year-olds (NIS-Teen) and 63.2% (62.8-63.5%) among 11-12-year-olds (claims). MenB was 33.7% (30.5-37.1%) among ≤17-year-olds (NIS-Teen), 41.6% (41.2-42.0%) among 16-18-year-olds (claims), and 15.0% (14.7-15.4%) among 19-23-year-olds (claims). The states with the lowest and highest MenB uptake by ≤17-year-olds in 2021 (NIS-Teen) were Minnesota (10.1% [3.9-23.6%]) and North Dakota (69.9% [52.1-83.2%]). Factors associated with MenACWY uptake included living in a state with a vaccine mandate, Black or Hispanic race (versus White), and well-child visit attendance. Factors associated with MenB uptake included having Medicaid (versus private insurance) and Hispanic race (versus White). The findings suggest that meningococcal vaccination coverage disparities persist across vaccines, age, geography, and race and ethnicity. Higher MenACWY (versus MenB) coverage suggests the benefit of routine recommendations. Annual well-child visits and simplified vaccination schedules could reduce vaccination access barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.