ArticleBioconjugate chemistry2025
Improved Pendant-Bearing Glucose-Neopentyl Glycols for Membrane Protein Stability.
Article in Bioconjugate chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coming Clean and Avoiding Bubble Trouble-Using Detergents Wisely in the Purification of Membrane Proteins for Cryo-EM Studies.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Design and Synthesis of Hetero-Bicephalic Detergents for Native Mass Spectrometry of Membrane Proteins.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Membrane proteins are biologically and pharmaceutically significant, and determining their 3D structures requires a membrane-mimetic system to maintain protein stability. Detergent micelles are widely used as membrane mimetics; however, their dynamic structures often lead to the denaturation and aggregation of encapsulated membrane proteins. To address the limitations of classical detergents in stabilizing membrane proteins, we previously reported a class of glucose-neopentyl glycols (GNGs) and their pendant-bearing versions (P-GNGs), several of which proved more effective than DDM in stabilizing membrane proteins. In this study, we synthesized additional GNG derivatives by varying the lengths of the pendant (P-GNGs), and by introducing hemifluorinated pendants to the GNG scaffold (fluorinated pendant-bearing GNGs or FP-GNGs). The synthetic flexibility of the GNG chemical architecture allowed us to create a diverse range of derivatives, essential for the effective optimization of detergent properties. When tested with two model membrane proteins (a transporter and a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR)), most of the new (F)P-GNGs demonstrated superior stabilization of these membrane proteins compared to DDM, the original GNG (OGNG)), and a previously developed P-GNG (i.e., GNG-3,14). Notably, several P-GNGs synthesized in this study were as effective as or even better than lauryl maltose neopentyl glycol (LMNG) in stabilizing a human GPCR, beta2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR). Enhanced protein stability was particularly observed for the P-GNGs with a butyl (C4) or pentyl (C5) pendant, indicating that these pendant sizes are optimal for membrane protein stability. The volumes of these pendants appear to minimize the empty spaces in the micelle interiors, thereby enhancing detergent-detergent interactions in micelles complexed with the membrane proteins. Additionally, we identified one FP-GNG that was more efficient at extracting the transporter and more effective at stabilizing the GPCR than DDM. Thus, the current study demonstrates that both chain length and number of fluorine atoms in the pendants of the P-GNGs were crucial determinants for membrane protein stability. We not only developed a few (F)P-GNGs that are significantly more effective than maltoside detergents (LMNG/DDM) for protein extraction and stability but we also provided an effective strategy for detergent design through the utilization of partially fluorinated pendants of varying length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.