ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Weekly Biological Variation of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio and Urine Specific Gravity in Healthy Dogs.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrine protein-creatinine ratio (UPC) and urine specific gravity (USG) are important measurements in the determination of renal proteinuria and chronic kidney disease. Biological and analytical variation estimates of these analytes to calculate the index of individuality (IoI) and a reference change value (RCV) are important to determine whether a population-based reference interval can be used to detect clinically meaningful changes and facilitate the interpretation of serial measurements.
objectiveDetermine the biological variation of UPC and USG using calculations of RCV and IoI in healthy dogs. ANIMALS: Eleven healthy client-owned young adult dogs.
methodsProspective observational study. First-morning urine samples were collected by voiding once weekly for 6 consecutive weeks for batch analysis. Twenty random samples were run in duplicate. Urine protein concentration, urine creatinine concentration, and USG were measured using a colorimetric pyrogallol red molybdate complex, enzymatic Jaffe method, and manual refractometer, respectively. Restricted maximum likelihood estimations were used to determine within-individual, between-individual, and analytical coefficients of variation and calculation of RCV and IoI.
resultsAll dogs were non-proteinuric at enrollment (UPC < 0.2) and remained non-proteinuric on subsequent measurements. Urine protein concentration, urine creatinine concentration, UPC, and USG had intermediate individuality. The RCV was 73% for urine protein concentration, 68% for urine creatinine concentration, 31% for UPC, and 3% for USG.
conclusionPopulation-based reference intervals for UPC and USG should be interpreted cautiously for single measurements and calculated RCVs should be applied to serial measurements to identify clinically meaningful changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.