ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2025
Scoping a paediatric emergency medicine unit.
Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the characteristics and potential patient cohorts suitable for a paediatric emergency medicine unit (PEMU), otherwise known as a short stay unit, at Canberra Hospital, a tertiary mixed adult/paediatric ED treating 98 000 patients annually.
methodRetrospective descriptive study of paediatric (aged <16) presentations to Canberra Hospital ED between May and August 2022. Patients discharged from ED with a length of stay exceeding 4 h and those admitted non-surgically for less than 2 nights were deemed PEMU suitable; those requiring admission for >2 nights were classed as inpatient ward admission (IWA) patients. Royal children's hospital clinical practice guidelines were used where available to classify the severity of disease via features apparent in ED.
resultsEight thousand three hundred and forty episodes were identified as paediatric ED presentations, with 1377 (64.8%, 95%CI 62.8-66.9) retrospectively PEMU suitable. This winter sample identified an average of 11.9 potential PEMU suitable cases daily. Chart review showed clinically mild bronchiolitis, mild asthma, anaphylaxis, mild gastroenteritis, afebrile seizure - no known seizure diagnosis, and simple febrile seizures had an excellent profile for PEMU, with subsequent ward admission rates of 17% or less. A mean 7-h stay would require 5 beds with 66% occupancy over 24 h.
conclusionsSeveral common paediatric diagnoses are well-suited to a PEMU unit, with reasonable occupancy and length of stay. The low inpatient admission rate suggests less common diagnoses should also be regarded as suitable. Further research is required to identify other paediatric patients and diagnoses suitable for PEMU, and to ratify findings in a whole-of-year sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.