Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104924›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025

Seven questions for a student's donor: Evaluation of a fictional conversation lends insight into professional identity formation in medical students.

John Arthur, Waleed Aldadah, Meghan Bernier, Andrew Ko, Jennifer F Dennis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John ArthurCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City University, Joplin, Missouri, USA.
Waleed AldadahCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City University, Joplin, Missouri, USA.
Meghan BernierCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City University, Joplin, Missouri, USA.
Andrew KoCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City University, Joplin, Missouri, USA.
Jennifer F DennisDepartment of Academic Affairs, Kansas Health Science University-Kansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Wichita, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1412-1527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reflection exercises have been used within anatomy education to evaluate empathy, humanism, and professionalism. A typical reflection exercise consists of directed prompts to guide the student's reflection as it relates to the experience and/or research question. The aim of this study was to utilize reflections through an open-ended format to enable students to explore their experience participating in donor dissection as they form their professional identity. The "Seven Questions" exercise was developed to create an imaginary discourse between the medical student and their donor. Students were prompted to provide seven questions they would like to ask their donor, if still living, and provide a 2-3 sentence explanation as to their interest, meaning, and/or purpose of each question. Submissions (n = 418) were evaluated using thematic analysis and four themes were identified: body donation, career development, patient history, and donor gestalt. The theme of body donation included questions specific to the decision to donate one's body for medical education, sharing one's decision with family and electing educational vs. organ donation. The career development theme included questions focused on the donor's previous experience with physicians, hesitation regarding student dissection, and advice for the student dissector. The third theme, patient history, included inquiries related to social history, review of systems, and family history. The final theme of donor gestalt focused on the donor's self-care and legacy. Student responses suggest that dissection and the donor experience organically support students modeling physician behaviors and should be considered as an educational opportunity to aid in developing physician identity.

Indexed as

AnatomyDissectionEducation, Medical, UndergraduateProfessionalismStudents, MedicalTissue DonorsCadaverFemaleHumansMaleSocial IdentificationTissue and Organ Procurementdonorsempathygross anatomyhistory and physicalphysician identity

Identifiers

PMID40104924
PMCPMC12051091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.