ArticleJournal of sleep research2025
The influence of sleep disruption on learning and memory in fish.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics of the sleep structure in the cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus.Zoological letters · 2026Article
- The influence of sleep disruption on learning and memory in fish.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep is a ubiquitous process that has been conserved in animals. Yet, our understanding of the functions of sleep largely derives from a few species. Sleep is considered to play an important role in mental processes, including learning and memory consolidation, but how widespread this relationship is across taxa remains unclear. Here, we test the impact of sleep disruption on the ability of the cleaner fish (Labroides dimidiatus) to both learn and remember a novel cognitive task. Sleep was disrupted by exposing a subset of fish to light at set intervals during the night. We found a significant negative relationship between sleep disruption and the ability to learn a novel task. Specifically, we found that fish in the light-disturbed sleep treatment took significantly longer and made more incorrect decisions to find a food reward, compared with the undisturbed sleep treatment. All fish were then allowed a normal sleep schedule and retested several days later to assess their ability to remember the task. In contrast to the learning phase, we observed no significant differences between the two treatment groups in remembering the food reward several days later. Our results demonstrate a negative impact of sleep disruption on performance in a cognitive challenging task that appeared to have the strongest effect when fish were first exposed to the challenge. Importantly, we show that the association between sleep and mental processes, such as learning, may be widespread across vertebrate taxa and potentially have an early origin in the evolutionary history of vertebrate animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.