Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104854›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025

Effect of bisphosphonate vs. osteoprotegerin during orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kuri Tupak Sarango-Quishpe, María Isabel Cabrera-Padrón, José Esteban Torracchi-Carrasco, Gloria Andrade-Medina, Cesar Heriberto Juela-Moscoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kuri Tupak Sarango-QuishpeCollege of Dentistry, Catholic University of Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0647-0835
María Isabel Cabrera-PadrónCollege of Dentistry, Catholic University of Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4086-6082
José Esteban Torracchi-CarrascoCenter for Research, Innovation and Technology Transfer (CIITT), Catholic University of Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8901-7022
Gloria Andrade-MedinaCollege of Dentistry, Catholic University of Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2867-1055
Cesar Heriberto Juela-MoscosoCollege of Dentistry, Catholic University of Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-6607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Orthodontic appliances are commonly used to achieve anchorage during orthodontic treatments; however, their use can contribute to oral diseases. Studies have shown that bisphosphonates and osteoprotegerin are highly effective in reducing orthodontic tooth movement. To determine the efficacy of bisphosphonates and osteoprotegerin in reducing orthodontic tooth movement. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases-MEDLINE-PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Taylor & Francis-up to August 2, 2023. Clinical trials conducted in healthy animals, where bisphosphonates and osteoprotegerin were administered during tooth movement, were included. The search identified 3,099 articles, which underwent a two-phase screening process, resulting in twelve studies for the systematic review and seven for the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool, and Egger's regression was used to evaluate publication bias. Results: The administration of bisphosphonates was more effective than osteoprotegerin in reducing mesiodistal orthodontic movement. However, osteoprotegerin did not significantly reduce orthodontic tooth movement. Conclusions: The findings align with previous studies, confirming the superior efficacy of bisphosphonates over osteoprotegerin. Further research is required to determine the optimal dosage and mechanism of action for these drugs in clinical practice, considering the specific objectives of orthodontic treatments.

Indexed as

AnimalBisphosphonateOrthodontic anchorageOsteoprotegerin

Identifiers

PMID40104854
PMCPMC11922635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.