ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Preemptive anticoagulation during antenatal pulmonary embolism diagnostics in a community setting: retrospective cohort study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antenatal Pulmonary Embolism Diagnostics in Pregnant Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Community Hospitals.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Strategies to Reduce Advanced Imaging in Antenatal Pulmonary Embolism Diagnostics.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Society recommendations for preemptive (or empiric) anticoagulation during antenatal pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnostics rely on expert opinion, which varies widely across guidelines. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST), for example, recommends preemptive anticoagulation when PE is highly suspected or when a delay in imaging is anticipated. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, however, makes no mention of preemptive anticoagulation for suspected PE in their practice bulletin on thromboembolism in pregnancy. Patterns of preemptive anticoagulation in pregnancy are unknown. Objectives: To describe the prevalence of and CHEST-based eligibility for preemptive anticoagulation in pregnancy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was undertaken across 21 United States community hospitals from October 1, 2021 through March 30, 2023. We included pregnant adults without COVID-19 undergoing definitive diagnostic PE imaging. We used pregnancy-adapted Geneva scores to calculate pretest probability as a proxy for suspicion. Results: We included 326 patients: median age, 31.0 years; 51% were in the third trimester. Diagnostic settings included emergency departments ( Conclusion: We found rare use of preemptive anticoagulation during antenatal PE diagnostics in this imaged cohort with low PE prevalence and rapid access to diagnostic imaging. More research is needed to explore setting-specific variation in preemptive anticoagulation use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.