Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104778›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Education2025

Education Research: The Landscape of Adult Neurology Residency Didactic Curricula in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Harry W Sutherland, Christine E Gummerson, John Encandela, Fábio A Nascimento, Jeremy J Moeller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harry W SutherlandDepartment of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8654-1737
Christine E GummersonDepartment of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
John EncandelaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Fábio A NascimentoDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7161-6385
Jeremy J MoellerDepartment of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6135-5572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Neurology residents learn through work-based learning, self-directed learning, and formal didactics. US residency program didactic curricula comply with national standards, but there may be wide design variation. No organization collects data on curricula, so the landscape of educational practices is unclear. This makes it difficult for program directors (PDs) to compare their approach with their peers' and identify methods of interest used elsewhere. We sought to describe existing curricular designs, examine features associated with resident attendance, and evaluate utilization of asynchronous learning. Methods: A survey was designed and validated following established standards. Anonymous online surveys were distributed by email to PDs of US adult neurology programs in April 2023, with responses collected until July 2023. Responding program characteristics were compared with national norms to check representativeness. Descriptive statistics were used to delineate the range of curricular designs. Associations between didactic choices, program characteristics, and attendance were analyzed using nonparametric methods. Results: Seventy-six (42.0%) of 181 programs responded. Respondents were more likely to be academically based (82% vs 63% nationally, Discussion: The results of this survey describe the landscape of formal didactic curricula. Residency programs use a range of strategies to achieve their educational aims, although some elements are more common to certain program types and some were more successful at increasing resident attendance. Further study is needed to determine best practices from available methodologies.

Identifiers

PMID40104778
PMCPMC11919388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.