ArticleJournal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques2025
Ensuring guideline adherence and cost savings in stress ulcer prophylaxis practices in the intensive care unit: a pre-post education study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Prevention Bundle: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Saudi Study to Assess Knowledge, Adherence, and Perceived Barriers Among ICU Practitioners in Hail Region.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimizing stress ulcer prophylaxis practices and reducing associated costs in intensive care units: a non-randomized controlled study.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to enhance adherence to the guideline through an educational program focused on reducing inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) and cost savings in the intensive care unit (ICU). Method: This study was designed as a nonrandomized, controlled, prospective study created according to the pre-education (PreEd) and post-education (PostEd) evaluation model and conducted between January and July 2024. The appropriateness of SUP uses for the indication was evaluated according to the Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados (SPC) SUP guideline. Adherence rates to the SPC SUP guideline and the costs associated with nonadherence were evaluated. Results: 495 patients were included in the study, 244 in PreEd and 251 in PostEd. 58.2% of the patients were male, and the hospitalization was mainly for medical reasons (59.6%). The mean ± SD rate of patients with appropriate SUP indication was 38.3 ± 41.6% in PreEd and 47.8 ± 42.8% in PostEd (p = 0.005). The total costs of inappropriate indication and proton pump inhibitor use in PreEd and PostEd were 272 dollars and 246 dollars, respectively (p = 0.007). Accordingly, when inappropriate SUP agent use was calculated per patient in both periods, the total cost saving was 34 dollars. Conclusion: Inappropriate SUP use is common in the ICU. Adequate adherence to guidelines and proactive involvement of clinical pharmacists may reduce inappropriate SUP use and associated costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.