ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Genome-wide profiling of a prognostic RNA-binding protein signature in esophageal cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinformatics analysis identifiesTranslational cancer research · 2025Article
- Stemness-related gene signature for predicting therapeutic response in patients with esophageal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are known to be involved in the initiation and development of malignant tumors, but the roles of RBPs in esophageal cancer (EC) remain unclear. This study aims to establish a prognostic signature based on RBPs through genome-wide analysis to predict the prognosis of EC patients and provide new insights into chemoresistance. Methods: The gene expression profiles and clinical data of patients with EC were downloaded from the Xena database. Candidate genes were obtained by taking the intersection of RBP genes, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway-related genes, and differentially expressed RBP genes from cluster analysis. Hub genes were extracted via protein-protein interaction network construction. A Cox proportional hazards regression model with seven prognostic RBPs (TRMT2A, PDHA1, MPRIP, KRI1, IL17A, HSPA1A, and HIST1H4J) was built. The risk score of each patient in internal and external dataset cohorts was calculated, and then the patients were divided into two groups based on the median value. Results: There were significant differences in survival curves between the two risk groups in the internal and external dataset cohorts (P<0.05). In terms of chemotherapy, there was a significant association between RBP risk score and response to chemotherapy, with low-risk patients being more likely to achieve complete response. Finally, univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that the risk score was significantly correlated with overall survival (P<0.05), and pathological stage could also be used independently to predict the prognosis of EC. Conclusions: Our study indicated that the RBP signature could serve as a prognostic biomarker of EC and provided new insights into the chemoresistance of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.