ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
The causal effects of 2,821 protein level ratios on non-small cell lung cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a complex etiology, making early diagnosis difficult and leading to high mortality rates, thus necessitating personalized treatment strategies. While protein level ratios have shown potential as biomarkers or therapeutic targets, their causal relationship with NSCLC remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate these causal links using Mendelian randomization (MR), providing insights into potential biomarkers and therapeutic avenues. Methods: We executed an intricate two-sample MR study to explore the stochastic causal links between 2,821 protein level ratios and NSCLC. The genome-wide association study (GWAS) statistics for NSCLC and protein level ratios were sourced from the Finnish Database (version 10) and the UK Biobank, respectively. For the instrumental variables (IVs) related to protein level ratios, we selected IVs with a P value <1.0×10 Results: Our study identified causal relationships between 142 protein level ratios and NSCLC. Notably, the AKR1B1/SUGT1 protein level ratio and the PLPBP/STIP1 protein level ratio demonstrated the most significant negative correlations with NSCLC risk. On the other hand, the ARHGEF12/IRAK4 protein level ratio and the BANK1/LBR protein level ratio exhibited the most significant positive correlations. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses did not reveal any significant heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. Conclusions: Studying specific protein level ratios in patients can reveal the molecular mechanisms and pathological processes of NSCLC, which has certain clinical significance for early diagnosis of NSCLC, understanding drug resistance mechanisms and developing personalized treatment strategies. However, these findings necessitate further validation through extensive clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.