ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Construction of a prognostic signature for breast cancer based on genes involved in unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LDHA as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Lactylation Regulation in Spinal Cord Injury: Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis, Experimental Validation, and Drug Prediction.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Article
- Acyl-CoA thioesterases and their derived lipid mediators: linking Acyl-CoA metabolic reprogramming to the tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) has been implicated in the onset and advancement of breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to develop molecular subtypes and prognostic signatures for BC based on UFA-related genes (UFAGs). Methods: This study integrates multi-omics and survival data from public databases to elucidate molecular classifications and risk profiles based on UFAGs. Consensus clustering and Lasso Cox regression methodologies are employed for subtype identification and risk signature development, respectively. Immune microenvironment assessment is conducted using CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms, while drug sensitivity and response to immunotherapy are evaluated via pRRophetic and TIDE methods. Gene set enrichment analysis augments signature characterization, followed by nomogram construction and validation. Results: We successfully identified two distinct BC molecular subtypes with significantly different prognoses utilizing UFAGs correlated with outcomes. A prognostic signature comprising three UFAGs [acetyl-CoA acyltransferase 1 ( Conclusions: Expression profiles of UFAGs are associated with BC prognosis, enabling the creation of a risk signature with implications for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying BC progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.