Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104710›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2025

Circulating white blood cell traits, chemokines and small cell lung cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study.

Huizhong Zhu, Chenyang Wang, Teng Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huizhong Zhu *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Changzhi Medical College Affiliated Heji Hospital, Changzhi, China.
Chenyang Wang *Department of Cancer Research Center, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Teng MaDepartment of Cancer Research Center, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) commonly originates in the context of persistent inflammation. The impact of white blood cell (WBC) counts and the presence of infiltrating inflammatory cytokines in relation to tumor initiation, progression, and treatment response in SCLC remains uncertain. To elucidate the potential relationships of circulating WBCs and chemokines with SCLC, we conducted a univariable (UVMR) and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) study. Methods: We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) investigation to evaluate the causal impact of circulating WBCs and chemokines on the risk of SCLC. The genetic data for SCLC were derived from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) involving 24,108 participants, including 2,664 cases and 21,444 controls of European ancestry. The genetic variances of circulating WBCs and chemokines were also from GWAS. In the analysis of UVMR, the primary method employed was the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method. To infer causality, robust adjusted profile scores, weighted median (WM), and MR Egger were employed as supplementary methods. To ensure the robustness of the MR results, sensitivity analyses, including the Cochran Results: Using two-sample MR, we found that genetic predisposition to CD45RA Conclusions: Using two-sample MR, we found that genetic predisposition to CD45RA

Indexed as

Mendelian randomization analysis (MR analysis)Small cell lung cancer (SCLC)white blood cells (WBCs)

Identifiers

PMID40104710
PMCPMC11912050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.