Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104706›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2025

Nomogram for predicting survival in breast cancer with lung metastasis based on SEER data.

Cheng-Liang Chen, Ni-Ya Chen, Shuo Wu, Xiao Lin, Xin-Wei He, Ying Qiu, Di-Xin Xue, Jie Li, Meng-Die He, Xi-Xi Dong and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cheng-Liang ChenDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Ni-Ya ChenDepartment of Medical Insurance Division, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Shuo WuZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiao LinDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xin-Wei HeDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Ying QiuDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Di-Xin XueDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Meng-Die HeDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xi-Xi DongDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wei-Ya ZhuangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Mei-Zhen LiangDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of breast cancer (BC) has been steadily increasing, highlighting the need for a predictive model to assess the survival prognosis of BC patients. The objective of this research was to formulate a prognostic nomogram framework tailored to forecast survival among individuals diagnosed with BC with lung metastasis (BCLM). Methods: Our information was sourced from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Individuals who were diagnosed with BC from 2010 to 2015 were selected. The 4,309 collected participants were randomly separated into a training cohort (n=3,231) and a validation cohort (n=1,078). In this study, age, marital status, race, tumor location, laterality, type of primary surgery, surgical margin, tumor grade, tumor (T) stage, node (N) stage, as well as the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were identified as potential prognostic factors. The overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (CSS) were defined as the primary endpoints of this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the impact of different factors on prognosis. Structured nomograms were developed to improve the prediction of OS and CSS. The concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to estimate the performance of the nomogram. Results: The nomograms incorporated age, marital status, race, primary surgery or not, BC subtype, grade, T stage, and the use of chemotherapy or not. The C-index for OS was 0.77, and it was 0.77 in CSS for the training group. The C-indexes for the control group of OS and CSS prediction were 0.78 and 0.78, respectively. ROC curves, calibration plots, and DCA curves displayed excellent predictive validity. The results indicate a median survival time of 1.67 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58-1.83], with a total of 3,640 deaths recorded. Survival time was found to be associated with factors such as age, marital status, race, whether primary site surgery was performed, BC subtype, tumor grade, T stage, and the administration of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Nomograms were created to predict OS and CSS for individuals diagnosed with BCLM. The nomogram has a reliable and valid prediction power; it could perhaps assist physicians in calculating patients' mortality risk.

Indexed as

breast neoplasmslung metastasisNomogramsprognosisSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER program)

Identifiers

PMID40104706
PMCPMC11912048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.