Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104693›Full record

Articlei-Perception

Spatial alignment and the motion bridging effect: Reversals in the direction of an illusory rotation.

Maximilian Stein, Robert Fendrich, Uwe Mattler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maximilian SteinUniversity of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0326-2634
Robert FendrichUniversity of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Uwe MattlerUniversity of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9680-9300

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a stationary ring of points precedes or follows an "inducing ring" of points that spins so rapidly it appears to be a steady outline circle the stationary ring often appears to momentarily rotate in the direction of the inducing ring's spin. In previous studies of this "motion bridging effect" (MBE) the start and stop positions of the inducing ring points were spatially aligned with the points of the stationary ring. Here we report that as these start and stop positions are progressively displaced across the spaces separating the points of the stationary test ring the MBE direction congruency effect decreases and then reverses, so that the illusory rotation is predominantly opposite to the direction of the inducing ring spin. This reverse congruency effect peaks when the points of the inducing ring start and stop midway between the points of the stationary test ring, with congruency returning as further displacements bring the point positions back into alignment. We conclude that the MBE is not only determined by the inducing ring's rotation direction, but also by an interaction between the inducing and test ring points at the moment the inducing ring starts or stops. We consider various ways of accounting this effect. Explanations based on direction cuing by apparent motion steps, the motion aftereffect, and biphasic impulse responses are ruled out. A speculative explanation based on perceptual heuristics that interpret the competing motion direction signals generated by a transformation of contour segments of the spinning ring into the points of the stationary ring (or vice-versa) is proposed.

Indexed as

apparent motionmotion aftereffectsmotion perceptionunconscious perceptionvisual illusion

Identifiers

PMID40104693
PMCPMC11915343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.