ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Morphological, functional and biochemical differences in cardiac adaptation to endurance exercise among male and female amateur marathon runners.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers Identify Distinct Biological Signatures of Eccentric Hypertrophy in Elite Athletes: A Sex-Specific Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Galectin-3 plasma levels are associated with left atrial contractile function in long-distance runners.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Exercise-induced ventricular changes in recreational half-marathon runners compared with marathon/ultramarathon runners.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Acute effects of marathon running on the heart: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2026Article
- Adaptive Changes in Endurance Athletes: A Review of Molecular, Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Findings.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Distinct Myocardial Remodelling Profiles in Athletes: A Comparative Analysis Across Sporting Disciplines.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sport is known to have beneficial influence on cardiovascular system. However, activities of high intensity such as marathon running may adversely affect cardiac morphology and function, especially in the heterogenous group of amateur athletes. As males and females exhibit discrepancies in cardiac response to training, we aimed to compare exercise-induced myocardial alterations between sexes among 61 amateur marathon runners, with the use of evolving echocardiographic techniques and cardiac biomarkers. Methods: The study followed three stages: 2-3 weeks prior the marathon (Stage 1), at the finish line (Stage 2) and 2 weeks after the run (Stage 3). Echocardiographic examination along with blood analyses for biomarkers of cardiac injury and overload [creatine kinase, high sensitivity cardiac troponin I, heart-type fatty acid binding protein, B-type natriuretic peptide, galectin-3 (Gal-3), endothelin-1 (ET-1), interleukin-6 and neopterin] were performed at each stage. Results: After the marathon there was a transient increase in right ventricular (RV) size and concomitant decrease in left ventricular (LV) volumes, leading to a significant increase of RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV)/LVEDV ratio (0.91 ± 0.21 vs. 1.10 ± 0.22, p < 0.001 in males; 0.73 ± 0.17 vs. 1.02 ± 0.22, p < 0.001 in females). Although at Stage 2 RV contractility decreased, while LV ejection fraction (LVEF) remained at the same level in both sexes, men had greater tendency for LVEF reduction (p < 0.05 for the interaction sex and stage). The concentrations of biomarkers were higher after the run in both study groups, except for ET-1 and neopterin, which increased post-race only in males. The larger training-related rise in Gal-3 level correlated with the greater drop in LVEF at Stage 2 (r = -0.42; p < 0.05). Less-trained marathoners with lower VO Conclusion: Marathon running induces transient cardiac remodelling, more pronounced in male than female athletes. Structural and functional changes assessed by echocardiography correspond with biochemical alterations. Galectin-3 was the best biomarker to reflect overload changes. Cardiovascular screening in amateur runners should be implemented to identify subjects requiring further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.