ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
NucleoSeeker-precision filtering of RNA databases to curate high-quality datasets.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter evaluation of prognostic nutritional index and systemic immune-inflammation index in predicting mortality among critically ill cardiovascular and cerebrovascular patients with varied glucose metabolism: a machine learning-based cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Influence of contact map topology on RNA structure prediction.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The structural prediction of biomolecules via computational methods complements the often involved wet-lab experiments. Unlike protein structure prediction, RNA structure prediction remains a significant challenge in bioinformatics, primarily due to the scarcity of annotated RNA structure data and its varying quality. Many methods have used this limited data to train deep learning models but redundancy, data leakage and bad data quality hampers their performance. In this work, we present NucleoSeeker, a tool designed to curate high-quality, tailored datasets from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) database. It is a unified framework that combines multiple tools and streamlines an otherwise complicated process of data curation. It offers multiple filters at structure, sequence, and annotation levels, giving researchers full control over data curation. Further, we present several use cases. In particular, we demonstrate how NucleoSeeker allows the creation of a nonredundant RNA structure dataset to assess AlphaFold3's performance for RNA structure prediction. This demonstrates NucleoSeeker's effectiveness in curating valuable nonredundant tailored datasets to both train novel and judge existing methods. NucleoSeeker is very easy to use, highly flexible, and can significantly increase the quality of RNA structure datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.