Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104611›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2025

Plant protein edible inks: Upgrading from 3D to 4D food printing.

Fatemeh Aghababaei, David Julian McClements, Marc Pignitter, Milad Hadidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatemeh AghababaeiAora Health, Calle Via de los Poblados, 17, 28033 Madrid, Spain.
David Julian McClementsDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, United States.
Marc PignitterInstitute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Milad HadidiInstitute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of plant proteins to formulate edible inks for 3D/4D food printing applications may help address challenges linked to food sustainability, personalized nutrition, and security. We investigate the suitability of various plant proteins for this purpose, including their molecular, functional, and nutritional attributes. Furthermore, we examine the potential of plant protein-based edible inks in 4D printing applications, where the shape or other properties of a material change over time, enabling controlled release profiles and texture modulations. We also discuss the environmental implications, regulatory considerations, and consumer acceptance of plant-based 3D/4D printed foods. Pea and soy proteins are widely used as inks for 3D/4D food printing applications due to their excellent structure-forming abilities, as well as their functional and nutritional properties. However, solely plant protein-based inks often lack essential characteristics required for optimal performance. Their properties can be enhanced by incorporating other food ingredients, such as polysaccharides and polyphenols. As this emerging field holds promise for addressing multiple global food-related challenges, it necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration and ongoing research to unlock its full potential.

Indexed as

3D printingAdditive manufacturingEdible inksPlant-based foods

Identifiers

PMID40104611
PMCPMC11914276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.