ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2025
Growth Response to Weekly Somapacitan Therapy in Children With GH Deficiency Is Related to GH Thresholds in GH Stimulation Testing.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Growth Response to Weekly Somapacitan Therapy in Children With GH Deficiency Is Related to GH Thresholds in GH Stimulation Testing.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: The lack of a severity definition and standardized GH cutoff level for GH deficiency (GHD) diagnosis in children leads to ambiguity in the interpretation of GH stimulation tests and treatment recommendations. Objective: To investigate treatment response differences among children with GHD treated with daily GH (somatropin) (year 1) or once-weekly somapacitan (years 1 and 2) based on GH peak concentrations assessed at diagnosis. Methods: This was a subgroup analysis of 200 patients with GHD aged ≥2.5 years participating in the REAL4 randomized, phase 3 trial. Height velocity (HV; cm/year) and changes in height SD score (SDS) and IGF-I SDS from baseline were compared for 3 GH peak groups: ≤ 3, >3 to <7, and ≥7 to ≤10 μg/L. Results: The ≤3 μg/L GH peak concentration group had the greatest HV at weeks 52 and 104. Mean change in height SDS ranged from 1.89 to 1.59, 1.17 to 1.06, and 0.92 to 1.07 at week 52 and 2.79 to 2.30, 1.64 to 1.54, and 1.33 to 1.51 at week 104 for the 2 treatment groups across the 3 GH peak concentrations, respectively. Mean change in IGF-I SDS ranged from 3.13 to 3.01, 2.11 to 1.96, and 1.87 to 2.26 at week 52 and from 2.81 to 2.11, 1.85 to 1.62, and 1.28 to 1.71 at week 104 for the 3 GH peak concentrations. Conclusion: Patients with GHD in the ≤3 μg/L GH peak concentration group had greater HV and greater changes in height SDS and IGF-I SDS from baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.