Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104568›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2025

Growth Response to Weekly Somapacitan Therapy in Children With GH Deficiency Is Related to GH Thresholds in GH Stimulation Testing.

Philippe F Backeljauw, Claudia Boettcher, Michael Højby, Nicky Kelepouris, Mathias Lerbech Jeppesen, Jun Mori, Alberto Pietropoli, Bradley S Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Philippe F BackeljauwCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2398-9520
Claudia BoettcherPaediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Julie-von-Jenner Haus, University of Bern Faculty of Medicine, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Michael HøjbyNovo Nordisk A/S, 2860 Søborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-0366
Nicky KelepourisNovo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ 08536, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2445-2338
Mathias Lerbech JeppesenNovo Nordisk A/S, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Jun MoriDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nephrology, Children's Medical Center, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka 534-0021, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1271-1577
Alberto PietropoliNovo Nordisk Health Care AG, 8058 Zürich, Switzerland.
Bradley S MillerDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, M Health Fairview Masonic Children's Hospital, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: The lack of a severity definition and standardized GH cutoff level for GH deficiency (GHD) diagnosis in children leads to ambiguity in the interpretation of GH stimulation tests and treatment recommendations. Objective: To investigate treatment response differences among children with GHD treated with daily GH (somatropin) (year 1) or once-weekly somapacitan (years 1 and 2) based on GH peak concentrations assessed at diagnosis. Methods: This was a subgroup analysis of 200 patients with GHD aged ≥2.5 years participating in the REAL4 randomized, phase 3 trial. Height velocity (HV; cm/year) and changes in height SD score (SDS) and IGF-I SDS from baseline were compared for 3 GH peak groups: ≤ 3, >3 to <7, and ≥7 to ≤10 μg/L. Results: The ≤3 μg/L GH peak concentration group had the greatest HV at weeks 52 and 104. Mean change in height SDS ranged from 1.89 to 1.59, 1.17 to 1.06, and 0.92 to 1.07 at week 52 and 2.79 to 2.30, 1.64 to 1.54, and 1.33 to 1.51 at week 104 for the 2 treatment groups across the 3 GH peak concentrations, respectively. Mean change in IGF-I SDS ranged from 3.13 to 3.01, 2.11 to 1.96, and 1.87 to 2.26 at week 52 and from 2.81 to 2.11, 1.85 to 1.62, and 1.28 to 1.71 at week 104 for the 3 GH peak concentrations. Conclusion: Patients with GHD in the ≤3 μg/L GH peak concentration group had greater HV and greater changes in height SDS and IGF-I SDS from baseline.

Indexed as

growth hormonegrowth hormone deficiencygrowth hormone replacement therapygrowth hormone stimulation testlong-acting growth hormonesomapacitan

Identifiers

PMID40104568
PMCPMC11915089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.