Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104492›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Systemic therapy for laryngeal carcinoma.

Thorsten Fuereder, Florian Kocher, Jan Baptist Vermorken

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. "Histologic type, treatment and prognosis of carcinomas of the larynx: A review".Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Oncology research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thorsten Fuereder *Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Florian Kocher *Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Jan Baptist VermorkenFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) accounts for 100,000 deaths worldwide each year. Despite multimodal treatment, outcomes for both high-risk locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic laryngeal carcinoma remain poor. Treatment intensification through induction chemotherapy has not improved overall survival, although it may contribute to larynx preservation. Consequently, multiple recent efforts have been made to integrate novel immunotherapies into the current treatment algorithm for LSCC. In particular, perioperative immunotherapy regimens appear to be the most promising approach for preserving laryngeal function and optimizing event-free and overall survival rates in the locally advanced setting. In the recurrent/metastatic setting, the 5-year overall survival rate is approximately 20% with pembrolizumab-based regimens. Primary and secondary resistance to immunotherapy is frequently observed in the majority of patients. Along with trials of checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, combinatorial approaches with novel immunotherapies, bispecific antibodies, targeted therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates are being explored for the treatment of recurrent/metastatic laryngeal carcinoma. This article aims to discuss recent efforts to improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic LSCC.

Indexed as

head and neck squamous cell carcinomaimmunotherapylaryngeal squamous cell carcinomalarynx preservationneoadjuvant

Identifiers

PMID40104492
PMCPMC11913863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.