ArticleCureus2025
Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal assessment of quality-of-life after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic gastrectomy (RG) has emerged as a promising approach for gastric cancer (GC) treatment, offering advantages such as enhanced dexterity, improved visualization, and increased precision. However, its widespread adoption remains limited due to technical complexity, high costs, limited applications, and insufficient evidence.
methodsWe conducted a single-center, prospective study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of RG, including robotic total gastrectomy (RTG), robotic proximal gastrectomy (RPG), and robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) with D1+ or D2 lymphadenectomy, in clinical stage I/II GC. The primary endpoint was the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, while the secondary endpoints included surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis.
resultsSeven patients were enrolled. No intraoperative complications or conversions to open surgery occurred. The primary endpoint was met, with no major postoperative complications. RTG had a longer operative time and more lymph nodes dissected than RDG and RPG. The median postoperative hospital stay was 10 days. Recurrence was observed in two cases, one of which achieved long-term survival without chemotherapy.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate the safety and feasibility of RG for early and advanced GC. Further multicenter studies with larger cohorts are needed to establish its oncological benefits and cost-effectiveness, facilitating broader clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.