ReviewCureus2025
Imaging Findings of Lupus Mastitis: A Systematic Review of Case Studies.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Pictorial Review on Mastitis: Clinical Aspects, Imaging Features and Complications.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lupus mastitis (LM) is a rare manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, resulting in an inflammatory process within the breast tissue. This condition presents diagnostic challenges due to its similarity to other breast pathologies, including infections and malignancies. Clinically, patients may exhibit symptoms such as breast pain, swelling, and erythema, often leading to further investigation through imaging and histopathological analysis. Given the absence of established clinical guidelines for LM, identifying the most effective imaging and laboratory techniques is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment. In this paper, 32 patient case reports were analyzed, with 20 patients having previous diagnoses of lupus and 12 not previously diagnosed. The study population comprised 90.6% (n=29) women, with a mean age of 44 years and an average disease duration of 10 years. The majority of LM was unilateral, with 50% (n=16) of patients experiencing LM in the right breast, 31.2% (n=10) in the left breast, and 18.8% (n=6) bilaterally. The location varied to almost all quadrants of the breast. The rarity of LM contributes to clinician unawareness, often resulting in misdiagnosis and confusion. As there are currently no guidelines, in this study we examined the imaging findings of LM through a variety of modalities and reported a suggested clinical guideline to follow for the diagnoses of LM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.