ArticleCureus2025
The Use of Telemedicine and Drones in Rural Clinics on Remote Japanese Islands.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analyzing Smart Healthcare Adoption in Remote-Island Primary Care Clinics: A Hybrid MDM-AHP Study from Kinmen Island.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dispatch of locum doctors to rural clinics on remote islands in Japan.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the limitations of resources and geographical isolation from the mainland, the use of telemedicine and drones may improve healthcare systems on remote islands. The aim of this study was to survey the status of telemedicine and drones in rural clinics on remote Japanese islands.
methodsAll rural public clinics (RPCs) on remote Japanese islands, managed in the rural plan of prefectural governments, were mailed a questionnaire on the use of telemedicine and drones in 2022. The survey data of RPCs on smaller remote islands (with a population of <1000 people) and larger remote islands (with a population of ≥1000) were compared.
resultsA total of 89 RPCs (40%) responded completely to the questionnaire. Twenty-one (24%) RPCs on smaller remote islands (41%) used telemedicine more than those on larger remote islands (7%) (P<0.01). Although no RPCs used drones for drug and specimen transfer, 33 (37%) wanted to use drones for drug transfer and 30 (34%) wanted to use them for specimen transfer. The desire to use drones for specimen transfer tended to be high in RPCs on smaller remote islands (43%) compared to that of larger remote islands (24%) (P=0.06).
conclusionsThe nationwide status of the use of telemedicine and drones was observed in RPCs on remote Japanese islands, which showed that RPCs on smaller remote islands used telemedicine and tended to want to use drones for specimen transfer compared with those on larger remote islands. This could be useful to develop healthcare and daily practice with telemedicine and drones, while considering the island's population size, on remote Japanese islands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.