Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104325›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025

Clipping closure length is a crucial factor for delayed bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Yuki Fujii, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Kiyoaki Ochi, Hitomi Himei, Ichiro Sakakihara, Eijiro Ueta, Tatsuya Toyokawa, Ryo Harada, Taiji Ogawa, Takeshi Tomoda and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yuki FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-9955
Kazuyuki MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5102-7452
Kiyoaki OchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fukuyama City Hospital, Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hitomi HimeiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ichiro SakakiharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan.
Eijiro UetaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization, Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Tatsuya ToyokawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization, Fukuyama Medical Center, Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ryo HaradaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Okayama Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Taiji OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Okayama, Japan.
Takeshi TomodaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Hironari KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Ryosuke SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Taisuke ObataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Akihiro MatsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Kazuya MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Daisuke UchidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Shigeru HoriguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Koichiro TsutsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Motoyuki OtsukaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bleeding is a serious and frequent adverse event that occurs during and after endoscopic papillectomy (EP). Previous studies have highlighted the effectiveness of preventive clipping closure of the resection site in preventing post-EP bleeding. However, the optimal length of closure remained unclear. Objectives: We aimed to clarify the optimal clipping length at the post-EP resection site to prevent delayed bleeding. Design: This study was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who were consecutively admitted to nine high-volume centers for EP between November 2003 and October 2023. The primary outcome was the frequency of delayed bleeding based on the closure length. The optimal closure length rate of the resected site to prevent delayed bleeding was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Secondary outcomes were the incidence, treatment outcomes, and risk factors for post-EP delayed bleeding. Results: A total of 130 patients who underwent EP were analyzed. Delayed bleeding was observed in 22 (17%) patients, occurring more frequently in cases without clipping closure than in those with clipping closure (28% (13/47) vs 11% (9/83); Conclusion: Clipping closure was effective in preventing delayed bleeding, and closure length rate ⩾65% of the resected site significantly reduced post-EP delayed bleeding.

Indexed as

clipping closuredelayed bleedingendoscopic papillectomy

Identifiers

PMID40104325
PMCPMC11915251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.