ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
Relationship between menstrual cycle and cognitive function in women with primary dysmenorrhea.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of menstrual pain intensity, menstrual symptoms, and catastrophization on cognitive function in young women with primary dysmenorrhea.The Korean journal of pain · 2026Article
- Intestinal microbiota alteration in women with adenomyosis and clinical characteristics correlation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: To evaluate the relationship between the change in pain intensity over days of the menstrual cycle and cognitive function in females with primary dysmenorrhea. Materials and methods: One hundred thirty-four females with primary dysmenorrhea who were admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to November 2023 were assessed. Of these participants, 46 individuals who subjectively stated that their cognitive function was affected, for whom neurology consultation was requested, and for whom patient data were available, were included in the study. Results: A significant decrease was seen in phonemic and semantic fluency on day 3 of menstruation (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). A significant decrease was observed in the forward and backward digit span (DGS) scores on day 3 of menstruation (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). A significant decrease was seen in the forward and backward DGS scores on the most painful day of menstruation (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). A significant decrease in the logical memory subtest Wechsler Memory Scale revised scores on the most painful day of menstruation (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Consistent with the literature, strong evidence was found showing a negative correlation between dysmenorrhea and cognitive function. Future prospective, larger sample-size studies comparing cognitive function in females with and without dysmenorrhea at various stages of the menstrual cycle are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.