Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104259›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025

From images to clinical insights: an educational review on radiomics in lung diseases.

Cheryl Y Magnin, David Lauer, Michael Ammeter, Janine Gote-Schniering

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quantitative computed tomography and predictive modelling for COPD exacerbations.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. A Brainstem Radiomics Framework to Distinguish Progressive Supranuclear Palsy from Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheryl Y MagninDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
David LauerDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael AmmeterDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Janine Gote-SchnieringDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiological imaging is a cornerstone in the clinical workup of lung diseases. Radiomics represents a significant advancement in clinical lung imaging, offering a powerful tool to complement traditional qualitative image analysis. Radiomic features are quantitative and computationally describe shape, intensity, texture and wavelet characteristics from medical images that can uncover detailed and often subtle information that goes beyond the visual capabilities of radiological examiners. By extracting this quantitative information, radiomics can provide deep insights into the pathophysiology of lung diseases and support clinical decision-making as well as personalised medicine approaches. In this educational review, we provide a step-by-step guide to radiomics-based medical image analysis, discussing the technical challenges and pitfalls, and outline the potential clinical applications of radiomics in diagnosing, prognosticating and evaluating treatment responses in respiratory medicine.

Identifiers

PMID40104259
PMCPMC11915127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.