Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104253›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025

Update in tuberculosis treatment: a scoping review of current practices.

Sofia R Lopes, Mariana Marçal, Nicole Fernandes, Filipa Silva, Pedro Barbosa, Mariana Vieira, João Pedro Ramos, Raquel Duarte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sofia R LopesLocal Unit of Health Cova da Beira, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6121-6883
Mariana MarçalLocal Unit of Health Arrábida, Lisbon, Portugal.
Nicole FernandesLocal Unit of Health Gaia e Espinho, Porto, Portugal.
Filipa SilvaLocal Unit of Health Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
Pedro BarbosaEPI Unit, Public Health Institute of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Mariana VieiraEPI Unit, Public Health Institute of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2406-3159
João Pedro RamosEPI Unit, Public Health Institute of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1450-6670
Raquel DuarteEPI Unit, Public Health Institute of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-3099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health challenge despite ongoing control efforts, particularly in the context of drug-resistant TB (DR-TB), where treatment success rates remain low, underscoring the need for new therapeutic options. This review synthesises current evidence, since the publication of the World Health Organization guidelines in 2022, on the safety and efficacy of existing and new regimens for drug-susceptible TB (DS-TB) and DR-TB in adults and children. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed across three databases for studies published between January 2022 and February 2024, focusing on current and new TB treatment regimens. Additional backward and forward citation searches were conducted to identify relevant literature. Results: 35 studies were included, evaluating the efficacy, safety and economic impact of new oral regimens for DS-TB and DR-TB. Regimens based on bedaquiline or delamanid demonstrated high success rates and good tolerability. The BPaLM (bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid and moxifloxacin) regimen was more effective and safer than the standard care, while shorter DR-TB regimens reduced costs and increased success rates. However, shorter regimens for DS-TB were associated with increased drug costs. Though limited, paediatric studies suggest that shorter, safer regimens may benefit children. Conclusion: Evidence supports the adoption of shorter treatment regimens for both DR-TB and DS-TB to improve safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Identifiers

PMID40104253
PMCPMC11915131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.