ReviewActa clinica Croatica2024
GIGANTISM AND ACROMEGALY THROUGH HISTORY.
Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giants and acromegalists have long captured attention, and they were often almost mythical creatures of great strength and power. Due to their expressive appearance, they were recorded in myths and works of art much earlier than they were of interest to medical practitioners. The first recognition was made by a Dutch physician Johannes Wier in 1567, but the first description and appellation originated by Pierre Marie in 1886. Involvement and interest from neurosurgeons followed, and in 1907, Hermann Schloffer performed the first transsphenoidal surgery in a patient with pituitary adenoma. In 1909, Harvey Cushing linked removal of the enlarged pituitary gland to regression of acromegaly and considered 'growth hormone' a pathophysiological trigger. Knowledge of acromegaly has been enhanced by the discovery of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) and evidence for an association between GH hypersecretion and elevated circulating IGF-I with the clinical phenotype. After 1970, pharmacotherapy (dopamine agonists, somatostatin analogs and GH receptor blockers) was introduced. Despite advances in drug therapy and radiotherapy, surgical treatment still provides optimal results (first-line treatment) after more than a century of attempts. In this paper, we present gigantism and acromegaly over time, important turning points from its recognition to the current insights and fundamental approach reminding us of the immense prosperity of medicine and science. The development of basic sciences and clinical endocrinology will enable progress and improvement of comprehension in the pathogenesis and diagnostics, as well as curative modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.