ArticleActa clinica Croatica2024
PATIENT-REPORTED SURVEY TO ASSESS CLINICAL STATUS AND SURGICAL OUTCOME AFTER ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION USING AN ALLOGRAFT WITH A FIXED ANGLE OF INCLINATION.
Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Degenerative cervical disc disease can be surgically treated by various procedures, one of which is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). It is used to stabilize the spine and decompress neural structures of the spinal canal. However, measuring its impact on postoperative clinical status and surgical outcome is difficult. That is the reason why patient-reported surveys are commonly used to assess clinical status and surgical outcomes. To evaluate the surgical outcomes of ACDF with an allograft with a fixed angle of inclination at one cervical level, we conducted a prospective study on 60 patients over one year. We used a structured patient-reported survey based on the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Odom questionnaire. Most patients experienced significant reduction in pain intensity in their arms and neck after undergoing ACDF with a carbon wedged-shaped allograft with a fixed inclination angle of 7º. This improvement was equally represented across all age groups and levels of the cervical spine operated on. Most patients also experienced a decrease in postoperative disability, as measured by the ODI, regardless of their age or the level of the cervical spine operated on. The majority of them rated their outcomes as either excellent or good, which was true across all age groups and levels of the cervical spine. In conclusion, patient-reported clinical status and outcome surveys are valuable and easy-to-perform tools for evaluating the quality of life of patients suffering from degenerative cervical disc disease after ACDF with a carbon cage having a fixed inclination angle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.