Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104212›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2025

Phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of ustekinumab in patients with Takayasu arteritis.

Hajime Yoshifuji, Tomonori Ishii, Hiroki Ohashi, Katsunori Yoshizawa, Maki Mihoya, Kazuko Nishikawa, Yoshikazu Nakaoka

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04882072 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Ustekinumab in Participants With Takayasu Arteritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04882072 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Ustekinumab in Participants With Takayasu Arteritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Pharmaceutical K.K.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled14ConditionsTakayasu ArteritisArmsUstekinumab, Placebo, Glucorticoid Taper Regimen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Management of Takayasu Arteritis - A 2026 Update.Current rheumatology reports · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hajime YoshifujiRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7082-4900
Tomonori IshiiDivision of Hematology and Rheumatology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Miyagi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-5824
Hiroki OhashiJanssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6546-0323
Katsunori YoshizawaJanssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Maki MihoyaJanssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuko NishikawaJanssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshikazu NakaokaDepartment of Vascular Physiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8404-2587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare, chronic large vessel vasculitis with unmet treatment needs. This phase 3 study aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of ustekinumab (UST) in Japanese patients with TAK. Methods: Patients with TAK who had relapsed ≤12 weeks prior to study intervention administration and achieved remission thereafter with standard-of-care including corticosteroid intensification were randomized 1:1 to receive UST or matching placebo with protocol-defined oral glucocorticoid taper regimen. The double-blind (DB) phase was up to the patient's relapse/total of 35 relapse events, followed by the open-label extension (OLE) phase. Primary endpoint was the time to relapse of TAK per protocol-defined criteria through the end of the DB phase. Results: The study was terminated early due to patient recruitment challenge. Of 14 patients randomized, 8 relapsed during the DB phase (UST: 4/6; placebo: 4/8). The median time to relapse (weeks) was 11.14 (95% CI: 4.14, not estimated [NE]) for UST and 12.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.14, NE) for placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.86 [95% CI: 0.41, 8.47]). In the DB phase, one patient in each group reported serious adverse event (SAE; UST: vascular pseudoaneurysm and brachiocephalic artery stenosis; placebo: cholecystitis); none were related to study intervention. Through the OLE phase, 1/4 (25.0%) patients in the UST-UST group (vascular graft infection considered related to study intervention) and none in the placebo-UST had SAEs. There were no serious infections/deaths throughout the study. Conclusion: The efficacy of UST in patients with TAK cannot be adequately assessed as the pre-determined sample size was not reached, and the study was prematurely terminated. No new safety signal of UST was identified. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04882072; jrct.niph.go.jp, https://jrct.niph.go.jp, jRCT2061210007; Clinical Registry, CR108981.

Indexed as

biologicsclinical trialglucocorticoidphase 3 studyrandomized controlled trialrelapseTAKTakayasu arteritistaper regimenustekinumab

Identifiers

PMID40104212
PMCPMC11919447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.