Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104178›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2025

Bayesian modeling with locally adaptive prior parameters in small animal imaging.

Muyang Zhang, Robert G Aykroyd, Charalampos Tsoumpas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muyang ZhangDepartment of Statistics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Robert G AykroydDepartment of Statistics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Charalampos TsoumpasDepartment of Statistics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical images are hampered by noise and relatively low resolution, which create a bottleneck in obtaining accurate and precise measurements of living organisms. Noise suppression and resolution enhancement are two examples of inverse problems. The aim of this study is to develop novel and robust estimation approaches rooted in fundamental statistical concepts that could be utilized in solving several inverse problems in image processing and potentially in image reconstruction. In this study, we have implemented Bayesian methods that have been identified to be particularly useful when there is only limited data but a large number of unknowns. Specifically, we implemented a locally adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm and analyzed its robustness by varying its parameters and exposing it to different experimental setups. As an application area, we selected radionuclide imaging using a prototype gamma camera. The results using simulated data compare estimates using the proposed method over the current non-locally adaptive approach in terms of edge recovery, uncertainty, and bias. The locally adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is more flexible, which allows better edge recovery while reducing estimation uncertainty and bias. This results in more robust and reliable outputs for medical imaging applications, leading to improved interpretation and quantification. We have shown that the use of locally adaptive smoothing improves estimation accuracy compared to the homogeneous Bayesian model.

Indexed as

Bayesian modelingimage processinginhomogeneous parameterMarkov chain Monte CarloMarkov random field

Identifiers

PMID40104178
PMCPMC11913876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.