ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025
Complications and Early-Term Radiographic Analysis of a Novel Active Compression Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Nail With a Proximal Flexible Coil.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for failed osteosynthesis of the ankle joint using a retrograde femoral intramedullary nail: a retrospective observational study.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is used among other methods as a salvage procedure for complex foot/ankle deformity. Fixation is usually achieved through plate/screw constructs or intramedullary (IM) nailing. Although IM nailing uses smaller incisions, fusion rates are variable and complications rates ranging from 25% to 55.7% have been reported. The Phantom ActivCore (AC) nail could serve as a viable alternative to traditional IM nailing by allowing for increased compression capacity and a potentially lower risk of stress fracture. However, no studies have described the early outcomes of TTC arthrodesis using the AC nail. The primary objective of this study was to determine the rates of early-term complications and radiographic union of the AC nail. Methods: Inclusion criteria consisted of patients who had undergone a tibiocalcaneal or TTC arthrodesis using the Phantom Hindfoot TTC Nail System with at least 6 months of follow-up. Radiographic analysis evaluated for successful union and flexibility of the flex coil. Patients were monitored for postoperative complications and additional secondary procedures. Results: Twenty-one patients were included and had an average follow-up of 9.4 ±4.7 months (range, 4.3-19 months). No intraoperative complications were reported. Seven patients experienced at least 1 adverse event, which included device migration, asymptomatic nonunion, symptomatic nonunion, bone stress reaction, device prominence, and screw breakage. There were no events of perioperative fractures or device breakage. Two patients required secondary surgical interventions. The 5 remaining patients were managed conservatively. An average nail coil flexion angle of 2.6 ± 3.1 degrees and 0.8 ± 1.59 degrees was found on lateral and anteroposterior radiographs, respectively. The overall union rate at a mean follow-up of 9.4 months was 90.4% (95% CI 69.6%, 98.8%). Conclusion: TTC arthrodesis via the AC nail demonstrated similar union rates and outcomes at short-term follow-up compared with rates generally reported in the literature for other IM nail constructs. The AC nail was able to function as designed and allow for motion at the proximal bone-implant interface. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.