ArticleiScience2025
Enhancing malignant transformation predictions in oral potentially malignant disorders: A novel machine learning framework using real-world data.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A saliva-based surrogate associates with clinical outcome of oral potentially malignant disorders.British journal of cancer · 2026Observational
- Protocol for an interpretable self-attention artificial neural network framework to predict cancer risk in oral potentially malignant disorders.STAR protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the challenge of accurately predicting malignant transformation risk in patients with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). Using data from 1,094 patients across three institutions (2004-2023), the researchers compared traditional statistical methods, including a Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) nomogram, with machine learning (ML) algorithms. A novel Self Attention Artificial Neural Network (SANN) model was developed, trained, and validated alongside other ML models including ANN, RF, and DeepSurv. The SANN model outperformed all other approaches, achieving an AUC of 0.9877, with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision exceeding 0.96. In comparison, the Cox-PH nomogram achieved AUCs of 0.880-0.902. Comprehensive evaluations using Receiver Operating Characteristic, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis demonstrated SANN's superior predictive efficacy, robustness, and generalizability. These findings highlight the potential of customized ML models, particularly SANN, to enhance early identification and management of high-risk OPMD patients, outperforming conventional statistical methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.