Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40104057›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Electrolytic hydrogen production; how green must green be?

Marwan Sendi, Matthias Mersch, Niall Mac Dowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marwan SendiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Matthias MerschDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Niall Mac DowellThe Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrolytic hydrogen from renewable sources is central to many nations' net-zero emission strategies, serving as a low-carbon alternative for traditional uses and enabling decarbonization across multiple sectors. Current stringent policies in the EU and US are set to soon require hourly time matching of renewable electricity generation used by electrolyzers, aimed at ensuring that hydrogen production does not cause significant direct or indirect emissions. While such requirements enhance the "green credentials" of hydrogen, they also increase its production costs. A modest relaxation of these requirements offers a practicable route for scaling up low-carbon hydrogen production, optimizing both costs and emission reductions. Moreover, in jurisdictions with credible and near-to-medium-term decarbonization targets, immediate production of electrolytic hydrogen utilizing grid electricity would have a lifetime carbon intensity comparable to or even below blue hydrogen and very significantly less than that of diesel, emphasizing the need to prioritize rapid grid decarbonization of the broader grid.

Indexed as

Electrochemical energy productionElectrochemistryEnergy policy

Identifiers

PMID40104057
PMCPMC11914190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.