ReviewOpen respiratory archives
Effect of Funding Medications for Nicotine Dependence on Tobacco Control: A Narrative Review.
Review in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utilization and adherence to smoking cessation pharmacotherapy: A population-based study in Spain.Atencion primaria · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacological treatments for smoking associated with psychological counseling triple the chances of quitting. However, the accessibility of these drugs is limited by their financial cost. With this review we aim to demonstrate the effect of partial or full funding in terms of efficacy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. We conducted a literature search for articles related to the issues mentioned above: analysis of the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for nicotine dependence and the effect of their funding. It is shown that the funding of pharmacological treatment can increase the efficacy and effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions. Such funding increases motivation to make a quit attempt. In addition, these strategies can increase self-efficacy, generate social influence and change attitudes toward quitting. Although the funding of pharmacological treatment benefits all smokers, there are certain populations of smokers who are more sensitive to funding strategies such as social groups with lower incomes and lower educational attainment. These funding strategies for smoking cessation interventions have been shown to improve the health and quality of life of the population, as well as the economy, while reducing tobacco use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.